Try Valley
Put your outbound workflow to work.
Saniya Sood
Published:
Updated:
Published November 11, 2026 · Updated November 11, 2026
The short answer: pick Apollo if you want one database you can filter, export and email from on the same day, priced per user. Pick Clay if someone on your team will build tables that ask several data providers in turn, because asking several sources can find more emails and richer fields than one database, at the cost of setup time and credits. If nobody on the team wants to build either, look at tools that build the list from a plain-English description of your buyer instead.
Disclosure: Valley makes one of the tools mentioned on this page and has marked its entry clearly. Where another tool is the better fit, this page says so.
Valley is an AI outbound platform that finds the people most likely to buy from you, from live buying signals, natural-language search, or your own lists, qualifies them against your ICP, researches each one, and sends personalized messages across email and LinkedIn that get 15-45% reply rates, against a category average of about 2%.
Clay vs Apollo at a glance
Clay | Apollo | |
|---|---|---|
What it is | A workflow tool that pulls data from many providers into one table | One contact database with sequencing built in |
Where the data comes from | Multi-provider waterfalls (it asks several sources in turn) | Apollo's own database: 240M contacts and 30M companies, per its pricing page |
Skill needed | High: tables, waterfalls, formulas, AI columns | Low: filters, save, export or sequence |
Entry price | Free; Launch $167 a month on the pricing cards (the FAQ says from $185) | Free; Basic $49 a user a month billed annually (Apollo's plan walkthrough) |
How you pay | Data credits and actions per workspace, unlimited users | Per user, with a credit allowance per plan |
Email sending | Clay Sequencer on Growth; email campaigns listed on Launch | Email sequencing included from Basic |
CRM sync | Growth and Enterprise only | Core integrations from Basic; advanced CRM integrations on Professional |
Best for | Ops-minded teams that want the widest coverage and will build | Reps who need contacts and a sequence today |
Prices and plan contents were read on Clay's and Apollo's pricing pages on November 11, 2026. Apollo's page did not print per-seat prices to a plain read that day, so Apollo prices come from Apollo’s own plan walkthrough (September 17, 2026).
Key takeaways
Coverage: Clay's waterfall asks several providers until one returns a verified email, which can beat a single database on hard-to-find contacts.
Speed to a first list: Apollo wins. Filters, a saved search and a sequence take minutes; a working Clay table takes an afternoon the first time.
Cost shape: Clay charges per workspace in credits and actions with unlimited users; Apollo charges per user with a credit allowance. Small teams that build often pay less on Clay; teams with many reps and simple needs pay less on Apollo.
Non-technical teams: Apollo is the easier of the two. Clay's free plan caps tables at 200 rows and has no CRM integrations.
► Try Valley free for 7 days: find the people most likely to buy and message them in your voice
Give your sales team
an unfair advantage.
The two tools solve the same job, a list of the right people with a way to reach them, from opposite ends.
How Clay builds a list
Clay is a spreadsheet that runs data jobs. A table starts from companies or people (from Clay's own search, a CSV or a CRM), then each column asks a provider for a field: a work email, a phone number, a headcount, a technology. When the first provider has nothing, the waterfall asks the next. Claygent, Clay's AI research column, can read a website and fill fields no database holds. Launch adds job change signals and phone enrichment; Growth adds CRM auto-sync and web intent signals (Clay pricing).
What it costs in practice: every lookup spends credits, so the bill tracks how many rows you enrich and how many providers each row touches. The full plan-by-plan maths is in Clay's pricing and credits, explained.
How Apollo builds a list
Apollo is a database first. Filter by title, industry, size, location and technology, save the search, then export it or drop it straight into an Apollo sequence. Emails and phone numbers are revealed with credits. Apollo states 240M contacts and 30M companies on its pricing page, and email sequencing is included from the Basic plan (Apollo pricing).
What it costs in practice: a per-user subscription plus credits; how far the allowance goes depends on how many contacts you reveal. The plan and credit detail is in Apollo's pricing and credits, explained, and an honest review of the product is in the Apollo review.
Data quality and coverage
A single database is only as current as its last refresh, and every database has gaps by region and role. A waterfall reduces gaps by asking more than one source, which is how Clay can find emails a single database misses. The trade is effort: someone has to choose the providers, order them and watch the credit spend. Whichever tool builds the list, verify emails before sending and treat job titles older than a few months as suspect.
Which one for which team
Your team | Better fit | Why |
|---|---|---|
One or two reps, no ops help | Apollo | Filters and sequences work out of the box |
A GTM engineer or ops lead who likes building | Clay | Waterfalls and AI columns reach contacts a single database misses |
Many reps, simple targeting | Apollo | Per-user pricing with sequencing included is easier to manage |
Need CRM sync on a budget | Apollo | Clay's CRM auto-sync starts on Growth |
Want the list built from a description of the buyer, then messaged | Neither alone | See the option below |
Clay alternatives for non-technical users
If the honest problem is that nobody will build Clay tables, three routes avoid the build: use Apollo's filters; use an exporter on top of LinkedIn Sales Navigator (compared in building a lead list without Apollo or ZoomInfo); or use a tool that turns a plain-English description of the buyer into a qualified list. More options are in Clay alternatives for LinkedIn outreach and the best Apollo alternatives.
Give your sales team
an unfair advantage.
When Valley fits instead (Valley's own product)
Valley is not a contact database and not a table builder. It starts from people already showing a buying signal, or from a plain-English description of the buyer (how natural-language lead search works), qualifies each person against your ICP, researches them and drafts a message in your voice for LinkedIn, with email as an add-on. Valley is priced per seat (current prices at joinvalley.co/pricing). Starter covers LinkedIn, with email sending as an add-on; Plus, through a demo, adds 1,000 emails a month. Finding new prospects and finding and verifying emails use credits. There is a 7-day trial with a payment method.
Choose Valley when the goal is replies from people likely to buy, not a large export. Choose Clay or Apollo when you need thousands of rows for your own sequencer, phone numbers for a calling team, or enrichment inside a CRM. Side-by-side detail: Valley vs Clay and Valley vs Apollo.
► Book a demo: see how Valley would find, research and message your buyers
FAQ
Is Clay better than Apollo for list building? For coverage, usually yes, because Clay's waterfall asks several data providers in turn. For speed and simplicity, Apollo is better: one database, filters and sequencing in one place.
Can Clay and Apollo be used together? Yes. A common setup pulls a list from Apollo's filters, then enriches the gaps in Clay before sending.
How much do Clay and Apollo cost? On November 11, 2026, Clay's pricing cards showed Launch at $167 a month and Growth at $446 (its FAQ says from $185 and $495), with a free plan. Apollo's own plan walkthrough lists Basic at $49, Professional at $79 and Organization at $119 a user a month billed annually, with a free plan.
Which is easier for a non-technical team? Apollo. Clay rewards people who like building tables and formulas; Apollo works from filters.
Does Apollo or Clay send emails? Both can. Apollo includes email sequencing from Basic; Clay lists email campaigns on Launch and its Sequencer on Growth.
Which has more contact data? Apollo states 240M contacts and 30M companies in its own database. Clay does not own one database; it queries many providers, so its reach depends on the providers in the waterfall.
What is a good Clay alternative for non-technical users? Apollo's filters, a Sales Navigator exporter, or a tool that builds the list from a plain-English description of the buyer and messages them.
